Home arrow Forum
Online DVD Rental
FREE 2 week trial
The UK's leading online Service
blockbuster.co.uk
Browse Members
Join BritishWrestling.co.uk for free today and start building your social network
 
             No account yet?
Forum
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q (0 viewing) 
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
#15930
aaron_undercover (User)
Expert Boarder
Posts: 142
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q 5 Years, 4 Months ago  
I was on the WZW wrestling site.........

Anyway came across an interview with Gary Graham and he claimed Iceman was a "Legend" ......

How can Gary call anyone a legend, after all the Mick Mcmanus's, Alan Kilby, Johnny Saint, Haystacks, Daddy, Pallo, Les Kellett, Johnny Kidd, Roller Ball Rocco, Alan Colbeck, Adrian Street and many many more wrestlers deserve to be called legends...

After all these guys have done it all, and among the finest performers of their times.....Their names are carved in stone and wrestled for many years.

I just find it annoying that he calls a man that can bleed and go through tables a legend, yet becomes ignorant when it comes down to traditional British wrestling.

It looks like someone opens a website, who then thinks he is an expert on wrestling and he then opens a promotion and calls wrestlers that work for him "Legends"

Now i am not having a go at his wrestlers, but i am having a go at him for having the cheek to call anyone a "Legend" and they havent even busted their asses like the wrestlers of former years who went through the toughest training to become wrestlers, they then worked hard to make names for themselves.

You have to earn the right to be even classed as a "Legend" so anyone thinking they are "Legends" should think of the skill and the hard work the lads of yester-year had to put in to their performances.

We also have a great bunch of wrestlers on the circuit at the moment who get to go abroad and wrestle and work their arses off, yet seem to get hardly any recognition for their great achievments.

Doug Williams, Robbie Brookside are two of the most travelled men on the UK scene yet i have never heard anyone call them "Legends".....

So i am asking a question, what must you do to become a "legend"?

Surely i am right at getting annoyed at Gary Grahams interview when i read he is calling Iceman a "Legend" when he surely isn't ........ I am not having a go at Iceman i am using him as an example to why i think this Gary guy is totally wrong, and he should think about re-phrasing his words.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
      Topics Author Date
    thread link
When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
aaron_undercover 2003/07/28 08:27
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Stamford 2003/07/28 18:46
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Cherry 2003/07/28 19:55
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
wrestle-Zone.co.uk 2003/07/28 21:45
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Dusty 2003/07/28 21:48
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Dusty 2003/07/28 21:55
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Rob McKay 2003/07/28 22:47
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
wrestlingdatabase 2003/07/28 23:20
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
wrestle-Zone.co.uk 2003/07/28 23:30
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
aaron_undercover 2003/07/29 00:00
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Rob McKay 2003/07/29 00:28
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Simon Eaton 2003/07/29 00:50
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
surf_digby 2003/07/29 01:30
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Stamford 2003/07/29 01:38
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
aaron_undercover 2003/07/29 21:39
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
wrestle-Zone.co.uk 2003/07/29 23:13
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Stamford 2003/07/29 23:52
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
John Amos 2003/07/30 01:33
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Rob McKay 2003/07/30 15:10
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Stamford 2003/07/30 17:53
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
wrestle-Zone.co.uk 2003/07/30 17:57
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Stamford 2003/07/30 18:10
    thread link
thread linkthread link Re: When should you have the right to be called a "Legend&q
Simon Mason 2003/07/30 22:15
Go to top Post Reply
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop